Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Iran hits back over 'evil axis' charge

Rupert Cornwell
Monday 04 February 2002 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

If it ever existed, the post-11 September diplomatic flirtation between Iran and the United States is over, and with it any hope that the attack on America might have ended 23 years of enmity.

As recently as two months ago, the two countries were working on the interim government for Afghanistan, and conducting less visible meetings on a new relationship. Today they are trading insults.

Less than 24 hours after Donald Rumsfeld, the Secretary of Defence, accused Iran of helping al-Qa'ida and Taliban fighters escape, Tehran said the US charges were based on "hallucinations not evidence". Mohammad-Ali Abtahi, a Vice- President and a member of the reformist faction, replied to President George Bush's claim that Iran belonged to an "axis of evil" by declaring that the US wanted to dominate the world, and was using threats to do so.

The events have left no doubt that any brief rapprochement was built primarily on a common dislike of the Taliban, and the ancient principle that "my enemy's enemy is my friend".

Some State Department officials now fear that Mr Bush's attack has made it hard for moderates to dispute what the hardline clerical rulers have always said – that the US has no intention of becoming a friend.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in