Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Doubts over withdrawal of UK troops from Iraq

Colin Brown,Deputy Political Editor
Thursday 09 February 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Doubts about the withdrawal of coalition troops from Iraq were raised last night after the Cabinet Office rejected calls for an audit to be published on the readiness of Iraqi forces to take over their own security.

The request to publish the report by the retired US General Gary Luck was made under the Freedom of Information Act by Sir Menzies Campbell, the acting leader of the Liberal Democrats. But it was rejected on the grounds that it would "impact negatively upon the UK's international relations".

MPs said the report suggested that the withdrawal of some coalition troops later this year would be a gesture to relieve pressure in the US and Britain for the pull-out to begin, but that Iraqi forces were not ready for a large-scale reduction in US and British troops.

Tony Blair told MPs last year he wanted to publish the wide-ranging audit on the Iraqi forces by General Luck which had been ordered by Donald Rumsfeld, the US Defence Secretary. The Cabinet Office said publication would "significantly prejudice the UK's important interests with the US".

Nick Clegg, the Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, protested about a possible cover-up. "What does the report say about troop withdrawal - and have coalition mistakes prolonged our commitment?"

He said: "While parts of the report may be withheld for security reasons, how can theGovernment justify the suppression of even the key findings? Many will suspect the report contains uncomfortable reading for officials in the UK and America."

A Cabinet Office letter to Sir Menzies said publication would "allow more informed debate" about the withdrawal date but added: "The public interest in disclosure is more than outweighed by the public interest in withholding the information. Releasing [it] would undermine the relationship of trust, which exists between the US and the UK and the UK and Iraq."

The audit covered UK assistance to the Iraqi police service in southern Iraq. "Release of this information could undermine discussions and inhibit the provision of candid advice to senior officials about the development of policy towards Iraq," the letter added.

The refusal to release the Luck report follows clear hints from British defence officials that its findings cast doubt on the ability of the Iraqi forces to take over their own security. Officials said the report had been overtaken by improvements in Iraqi security.

Defence chiefs briefed Mr Blair on his pre-Christmas trip to Basra that progress with the Iraqi armed forces was quicker than anticipated but the Iraqi police were not ready for a handover.

The Defence Secretary, John Reid, gave a strong hint last week that the troop reductions would begin this summer. He said the next 12 months were crucial for the Iraqi people. "If the months go well, they bring the day closer when the Iraqi people can finally take control of their own futures.

"That also means that the time is approaching when the coalition which is helping them achieve this can begin leaving Iraq."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in