Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brown may increase war fund to £6bn

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Gordon Brown could be forced to ask Parliament for extra money to fund Britain's continuing presence in Iraq early next year, as new estimates suggest the cost of military action is running at about £4m a day.

Vince Cable, the Liberal Democrat Treasury spokes-man, warned that the Chancellor's £3.8bn fund to pay for operations in Iraq could be exhausted by January or February, if the scale of British involvement is maintained.

He said the overall cost of the British operation could approach £6bn if troops remained in Iraq through 2006, and added that there was the danger of widespread economic damage caused by the huge costs of the American-led operation.

Ministers are still debating whether to send up to 3,000 extra troops to Iraq to help quell continuing unrest amid warnings that Labour voters will use the local and European elections on 10 June to protest against the war.

Last week Geoff Hoon, the Secretary of State for Defence, confirmed that Liberal Democrat estimates that the war was costing £125m a month were "roughly consistent" with the confirmed costs since the invasion last year. Mr Cable said the long-term effect of the war could be damaging to the global economy, with instability in the Gulf contributing to increasing oil prices, and American borrowing to fund military action threatening to increase long-term interest rates.

He said: "The first Gulf war cost £2.5bn but Britain got 80 per cent of that back because it was backed by the United Nations. This war will cost Britain many times that because it has been done unilaterally.

"All this spending has an opportunity cost. It could have been spent on something else. Compared with the size of the national economy it is not all that significant, but as we enter the public-spending round there are commitments which we will not be able to make."

He warned that the huge US military spending in Iraq was helping to fuel the American budget deficit. "When you stack all of this spending up in the context of the widening fiscal deficit, there are wide implications for the rest of the world, building up long-term interest rates which everybody ultimately has to pay."

He also warned that oil dealers were paying a $10-a-barrel risk premium because of the increasing attacks by Iraqi insurgents on many of the country's oil installations.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in