Israel: Netanyahu challenge to legality of rival’s PM bid rebuffed
Likud claim over power-sharing agreement found to have no legal merit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A last-gasp legal challenge by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to thwart a bid by a rival rightist to head a new government was rejected on Tuesday as his opponents raced to seal a pact that would unseat him.
Naftali Bennett, Mr Netanyahu's former defence minister, announced on Sunday he would join a proposed alliance with centrist opposition leader Yair Lapid, serving as its premier first under a rotation deal.
They have until Wednesday midnight (21:00 GMT) to present a final pact to Mr Rivlin, who handed Mr Lapid the task of forming a new government after Mr Netanyahu failed to do so in the wake of a close election on 23 March.
Hoping to beat the deadline, Mr Lapid, Mr Bennett and other party leaders convened to clinch coalition agreements, sources briefed on the talks said.
In a letter to the legal counsels of the presidency and parliament, Mr Netanyahu's conservative Likud said Mr Lapid was not authorised to cede the premiership to Mr Bennett.
But president Reuven Rivlin's office said in response that there was no legal merit to Likud's claim because Mr Lapid would be sworn in as "alternate prime minister", second to serve as premier as part of the rotation.
It accepted Likud's argument that Mr Lapid must provide the president with full details of the new government and not just announce that he has clinched a coalition deal.
The Lapid-Bennett power-share may include other rightist politicians as well as liberal and centre-left parties. Israeli media have speculated it could also court parliamentary backing from a party that draws votes from Israel's Arab minority.
That has prompted Mr Netanyahu to accuse Mr Bennett of imperiling Israel as it contends with internal Jewish-Arab strife over last month's Gaza conflict, the moribund peace process with the Palestinians, and Iran.
Mr Netanyahu, 71, is the dominant political figure of his generation. He was first elected prime minister in 1996 and he returned to power in 2009, holding the top office for more than a decade. But he also faces a corruption trial for bribery, fraud and breach of trust - charges he denies.
A photo-shopped picture of Mr Bennett in an Arab headdress, circulated on social media, prompted comparisons with attempts to discredit former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, assassinated in 1995 by an ultranationalist opposed to his peacemaking.
An Israeli security source said Mr Bennett had received parliamentary bodyguards on the recommendation of the Shin Bet domestic intelligence agency due to the "atmosphere of incitement" against them.
Mr Lapid and Mr Bennett have said they want to bring together Israelis from across the political divide and end hateful political discourse.
"A country that is divided and violent won't be able to deal with Iran or with the economy. A leadership that incites us against one another harms our ability to deal with the challenges we face," Mr Lapid said.
Reuters
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments