Basra: a deadly zone where the threat is on all sides
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.One of the few pleasures of being stationed in the Shatt al-Arab hotel British army base in Basra is the sight of the river at sunrise.
Basra's waterway is a geographical reminder of when the now dilapidated building packed with containers was an elegant hotel for 1930s travellers on their way east and the locals would gather by the river to gossip. But yesterday the river became the site of one of the most lethal attacks to strike British forces in the southern Iraqi city. Troops stationed in the camps in or around Basra have long grown used to the fact that the roads provide a potentially lethal route. They know that if the local crowds disappear that they may be facing another roadside bomb, or improvised explosive device (IED) as the military calls them. Some streets have become notorious enough to earn the nickname IED alley.
For a long time the helicopters which fly between the camps appeared a safer alternative. Then a Lynx was shot down, killing five service personnel. It was one of a serious of lethal firsts which troops have had to contend with in 2006. The year has also seen the first soldiers to be killed by the mortars that are regularly fired at the bases. And just the other day Kingsman Jamie Hancock, 19, became the first soldier to be killed by small arms fire aimed at a camp sentry.
Now the river has claimed its first British lives. Yesterday's deaths will undoubtedly hit morale among troops who already say that they often feel that they are taking one step forward only to make two steps back. But perhaps more strikingly, it is yet another sign of the threat closing in from all sides.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments