Allied push on Baghdad 'on hold'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Allied push on Baghdad has been put on hold while efforts are made to resupply forces closest to the Iraqi capital, it emerged today.
The Allied push on Baghdad has been put on hold while efforts are made to resupply forces closest to the Iraqi capital, it emerged today.
Officers in the field described the move as an "operational pause" only involving units at the front end of the advance waiting for badly needed supplies.
The speed of the initial dash for Baghdad last week left supply and communication lines stretched. "We're trying not to screw ourselves up and to watch our rear by establishing these lines of communication," one US marine lieutenant told the Associated Press.
Reports from journalists 'embedded' with the marines said that the marines' advance had ground to a halt because of harrying by Iraqi troops, stretched supply lines and the recent bad weather in the desert.
The pause - reportedly set to last four to six days - came as the Iraqis accused the Allies of another attack on civilians in Baghdad.
The "operation pause" south of Baghdad is likely to be seized upon by critics of the Allied military plan, who claim that the need for troops and the strength of resistance they would face had both been seriously underestimated.
But Group Captain Al Lockwood, a British spokesman at the Allied Command Centre in Qatarm, today insisted military plans were "on track and on time".
He told Sky News what was happening was "not necessarily a pause just a reshaping of the battle space ... getting our troops equipped and in the right place for the next part of the campaign".
Yesterday, General Sir Michael Jackson, chief of the UK general staff, rejected reports that coalition forces had become "bogged down".
"Armies cannot move forever without stopping from time to time, to regroup, to ensure that their supplies are up and even, believe it or not, soldiers need a bit of sleep from time to time.
"So this 'bogged down' is a tendentious phrase. It's a pause whilst people get themselves sorted out for what comes next."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments