MEPs angry over new `Alcatraz' HQ
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A TIDE of criticism over the futuristic pounds 250m home for MEPs in Strasbourg dogged the new parliament's first meeting yesterday, overshadowing the election of the first female President of the assembly in 20 years.
Parliamentarians across the political spectrum united in anger at the shortcomings of the building dubbed "Alcatraz" by some French socialist representatives. Despite the election as President of Nicole Fontaine, a 57-year-old French barrister, most MEPs were preoccupied with the building's logistical nightmares - some calling for a return to their old site.
Neil Kinnock, the European Commission vice-president, whose wife, Glenys, is an MEP, described the new project as "ridiculous", adding: " I have great reservations and I have to say, since all of the pounds 250m that the edifice cost was paid by the French taxpayer, if I was the French taxpayer I would not be too happy about it." Rent on the building this year will be pounds 14m.
Mr Kinnock's views were echoed by MEPs of all political persuasions as they battled to accommodate their staff in confined office space, and to navigate their way around the maze of corridors. A breakdown of interpretation services, the failure of lifts and complaints over access for disabled people were among a catalogue of teething problems to dog the new building.
A newly elected vice- president of the parliament, the Conservative MEP James Provan, declared: "Many people are very dissatisfied with the office accommodation and are really questioning whether it was necessary. I am sure the old building could have been adapted. The competition between Brussels and Strasbourg [the two sites of the parliament] is getting out of hand."
In 1992, EU governments decreed that the parliament should have two main sites. Alan Donnelly, the leader of the Labour MEPs, who said the new building was "inexplicable to the public", blamed John Major for agreeing to its creation.
Complaints about the building overshadowed the parliament's first session, when Europe's centre-right domination was made clear by the election of Ms Fontaine. The 230-strong European People's Party won backing from the Liberals to defeat the socialist rival, the ex-Portuguese premier Mario Soares.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments