Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mental fitness of crew is not rigorously tested by airlines

David Usborne
Wednesday 17 November 1999 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

WHILE PILOTS worldwide have long been obliged to undergo rigorous and frequent medical checks to ensure their physical fitness for flying, provisions to screen them for mental problems are much more haphazard. Findings from the EgyptAir crash investigation may increase pressure on airlines to fill this apparent hole.

It would, however, be a challenge. While concealing physical ailments from a doctor is a virtual impossibility - you cannot feign good eyesight - it is much less difficult to hide mental and personal problems, ranging from depression to habitual drinking or drug taking. Pilots will always have a strong incentive to hide any problems if they know that to reveal them could cost them their licence.

US carriers do attempt some kind of psychological assessment of pilots when they hire them. There is no follow-up to these tests however. Even so, airlines say that when pilots undergo their six-monthly medical checks - the minimum standard for most of the rest of the world is yearly - the doctors are trained to watch for any signs of mental stress or imbalance.

But the case of a 1997 crash in Indonesia of a SilkAir Boeing 737 illustrates how such medical checks offer little guarantee that stress will be exposed. Investigators now believe that the plane was brought down by its pilot, Tsu Way Ming, in an act of suicide. Mr Tsu, according to the Thai-owned SilkAir, had undergone regular checks.

But if the pilots rarely own up to mental problems, the people around them sometimes do it for them. US carriers admit that when pilots are grounded for such problems as alcohol abuse, they have often been turned in by spouses.Some US airlines and the Federal Aviation Authority offer confidential tip-off hotlines.

Carriers also watch how pilots interact in the cockpit. American Airlines allows pilots to enter complaints about colleagues into a computer. They can request not to be assigned to fly with individuals whom they do not get on with or do not trust. Any pilot attracting a high number of such messages is automatically brought in for evaluation by management.

Even if a better model for screening the mental health of cockpit crews were to be designed, actually putting it in place would be difficult.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in