Iraq Under Fire: Arab states wary of backing US: Middle East reaction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE United States' Arab allies seem less willing to back its military actions against Iraq than they were two years ago.
Many official and independent organs have condemned the raids, and the 21-member Arab League, which was divided on the use of force to remove the Iraqis from Kuwait but eventually sanctioned Operation Desert Storm, seemed to be united in distancing itself from yesterday's US-led military strike.
The League issued a statement stressing the 'need to exercise self-restraint and resort to dialogue', and to 'respect the sovereignty and independence of Kuwait'.
The statement was interpreted by Arab diplomats as a desire by the League to be seen to be 'neutral rather than a party to a conflict between the West and Iraq', one Gulf Arab diplomat said last night.
The Arab League statement seemed to echo declarations made earlier by Amr Moussa, the Foreign Minister of Egypt, a key Middle Eastern nation in the 1990 anti-Iraq coalition. It cast a shadow on the legality of the strikes as well as that of the allied-imposed air-exclusion zones by expressing its 'concern for Iraq's sovereignty and territorial integrity'.
The question of the legality of the strikes was raised by a number of international law academics over the past few days in both the pro-government and opposition press in Cairo, which was the scene of anti-Israeli and anti-Western demonstrations by students less than a week ago.
In Jordan, King Hussein said he was deeply angered by the repeated attacks on Iraq by US-led forces. 'It is certainly a moment of sorrow and anger for all of us . . . We are very, very sorry that conditions have deteriorated to this point,' the King said.
Jordan has always opposed military intervention to solve the dispute between Iraq and the rest of the world. In recent months the King has more openly distanced himself from the Iraqi regime, and in his comments did not mention President Saddam Hussein.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments