Gore vs Bradley: Now it's personal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE RACE for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination looked wide open yesterday after the Vice-President Al Gore and former Senator Bill Bradley squared off on television in a fractious and at times fiery encounter that showed their best and worst sides, but did little to settle the contest.
It was their second confrontation of the weekend; they had faced each other in New Hampshire on Friday, in a "town hall meeting" that was broadcast after most Americans would have been in bed.
Yesterday's duel took place at the friendlier hour of 9am in the studios of NBC television in Washington on the network's flagship Sunday morning political talkshow, Meet the Press. Both candidates had mustered their supporters outside the building in advance to provide placard-waving guards of honour as they arrived and left.
They were answering questions from NBC's leading political interviewer, Tim Russert, and the more intimate surroundings of the studio drew each candidate to be more confrontational than before. Despite the best efforts of both men to restrict their disagreements to policy, flashes of sarcasm from Mr Bradley and exaggerated groans from Mr Gore during his opponent's answers betrayed an antipathy that goes beyond the political to the personal.
When Mr Gore challenged Mr Bradley to twice-weekly televised debates and a moratorium on all paid television advertising, Mr Bradley called the proposal a "ridiculous ploy" and said it sounded as though Mr Gore was having difficulty raising funds.
Riled by Mr Gore's denial, Mr Bradley retorted: "For 10 months when I was running for President, you ignored me, you pretended I didn't exist. Suddenly I started to do better and you want a debate every day. It's ridiculous. We're having debates."
Mr Gore leads Mr Bradley by more than 20 percentage points (53 to 28), according to nationwide opinion polls released at the weekend. However, Mr Bradley is either in the lead or neck and neck with Mr Gore in the key primary state of New Hampshire and in several north-eastern states, including New York and his home state of New Jersey. Both Mr Bradley and Senator John McCain, the chief challenger to George W Bush for the Republican nomination, have high hopes of New Hampshire, whose early primary election and reputation for liking a maverick give it the capacity to change the complexion of the race overnight.
While pundits complain that their policy differences are matters of detail, the differences in personality revealed under questioning are vast. Mr Bradley comes across as fluent, concerned and paternal, but defensive when wrongfooted. Mr Gore is energetic, aggressive, and almost animated.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments