Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Flat Earth: Judge not . . .

Peter Walker
Saturday 01 October 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE wonderful self-importance of judges is not, it's always nice to remember, confined to this country or even found in its worst forms here. Here, they only want country houses with cooks and butlers to dance attendance on them at taxpayers' expense. Elsewhere judicial caprice takes more worrying forms, extending even to the moment when sentence is passed.

Take the case of Philadelphia judge Ricardo Jackson who last week sentenced kidnapper Derrick Shaw to seven to 15 years in the pen. Leaving the dock, Shaw (who is black) offered the opinion that the judge (also black) was nothing but 'a house nigger'. Mortally offended, the judge hauled him back and slapped another 35 years on his sentence.

Meanwhile, New York is still puzzling over a ruling by bankruptcy judge Burton J Lifland, who is overseeing a billion-dollar takeover of Macy's department store. It all seemed to be in the bag when suddenly the judge demanded a guarantee, 'etched in stone', that the fireworks display climaxing the annual Macy's Parade would henceforth always be held on the East River. Over the years, Macy's fireworks have wandered about a bit - lower Manhattan, the East River, on the Hudson. Why on earth should a judge hold up the dollars 9bn ( pounds 5.7bn) deal to ensure the spectacle is on the East Side? Who can say?

Judge Lifland lives on East 53rd Street.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in