Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Flat Earth: Forbidden fruits of the cherry orchard

Michael Fathers
Saturday 20 November 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

ON an ordinary day, the Soviet censors would set about preventing people from reading about life and death in Stalin's labour camps, or from discovering that life in the West might be perfectly normal, even pleasant, rather than a non-stop capitalist nightmare. But sometimes the censors had real fun. It was their job to protect the reputation of the state's heroes, and that meant taking a blue pencil to the sexy bits.

A striking example has just come to light in the correspondence of the playwright and short story writer, Anton Chekhov, which was chopped and sliced by the keepers of the people's moral purity. The decision to excise the great man's observations on sex came right from the top - the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, as decreed by Instruction No 02030, dated 22 February 1968. We are just beginning to see these hidden directives now that scholars can dig through the files.

Thus, the four-line letter that Chekhov wrote to his friend Suvorin in 1880 was in fact a huge missive about out- of-bed sex. Some 600 words on the problems of making love on a sofa, on the floor or over a trunk, coping with all those petticoats and worrying about the servants coming in, were simply gutted. Out went all reference to Japanese women being better sexual partners than Russian ones - they 'take better care of you'.

Trying to do it with a Russian woman of 'decent standing' was usually not worth the effort. It was hard to find a suitable room; she wouldn't be seen entering a hotel during the day, and by the time you had got her into a hotel room at night, she had made such a song and dance about it that there was little pleasure left.

All the censors allowed was the following: 'Writers should be suspicious of any kind of chatter. If Zola (. . .) wrote, on the basis of rumours and stories from friends, then he was over- hasty and incautious.'

Even the three dots hid sex. The original read: 'If Zola did it himself, on tables, against fences, in dog kennels and in postillions, or if he saw with his own eyes, as it was being done, then you can believe his novels; but if he wrote on the basis of rumours and stories from friends, then he was over-hasty and incautious.'

Chekhov concludes that all these ways of doing it are nonsense. 'The simplest way is the bed. The other 33 are difficult, and can only easily be carried out in a single room in a hotel - or in a barn.'

But not even this vote for the missionary position was permitted by the party's moral police.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in