Fish ban may cost UK pounds 30m
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SARAH HELM
Brussels
Britain will learn this week whether it could be forced to pay up to pounds 30m in damages to Spanish fishermen after trying to ban their boats from British waters in breach of European law.
The advocate general of the European Court of Justice is expected on Thursday to advise the court whether it has the power to hear the long- standing damages claim brought by the Spanish boat-owners. Britain has already been told it had no right to try to stop the Spaniards, who had sought to exploit British fish stocks by registering their boats as British.
A further order that Britain must pay compensation to the Spaniards is likely to fuel animosity between British and Spanish fishermen and harden British attitudes towards the EU's fish quota rules.
The case goes back to 1988 when Spanish boat-owners, seeking to qualify for British fishing quotas, set up front companies and registered their boats as British.
Britain then passed a law preventing foreign-owned boats from registering as British. The Spanish vessels were called into port and tied up. In 1991 the European Court ruled that under single market rules all EU companies should have the right to register in any member state.
British fishermen argued that the ruling made a nonsense of the EU's fish quota system.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments