US holds its fire on Bosnia
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.AMID reports of a widening rift with its allies, the United States has reassured Britain and France that it has made no decision over whether military steps should now be taken to curb Serbian aggression in Bosnia.
London and Paris have strong reservations about two options under consideration in Washington: allowing the supply of arms to the Bosnian Muslims or launching air strikes against Serbian installations.
But Malcolm Rifkind, the Defence Secretary, said yesterday after talks here with Les Aspin, his US counterpart, that the US administration shared British and French concerns about the possibility of reprisals against UN soldiers in the region if either action is attempted.
'We all want tough action and we are all discussing how you can take tough action without jeopardising what the UN is already doing - our objectives are identical,' Mr Rifkind said in an interview with ITN.
While acknowledging that Washington is considering attempting air strikes or supplying arms to the Muslims, Mr Rifkind added: 'They haven't made up their mind yet. I have been heartened by the nature of discussion in Washington.'
Speculation about a possible US initiative is likely to centre on a press conference that Bill Clinton is scheduled to give today. While he is expected to touch on a range of issues, most of them domestic, the President may use his appearance to move Bosnian policy a step forward.
Senior diplomats in Washington remain doubtful, however, that Mr Clinton will do more than underline the need to tighten sanctions against Serbia. Analysis of the situation has been complicated by fighting between Bosnian Croats and Muslims. 'More work has to be done between Washington, Paris and London before any action can be taken. I don't see it being imminent,' said one source.
Warren Christopher, the US Secretary of State, continues to argue within the administration against military intervention. He said this week: 'I'm not one of those who thinks there is any great disadvantage in extensive and prolonged discussions.'
Mr Rifkind reiterated yesterday that lifting the arms embargo for the Bosnian Muslims might lead to greater bloodshed, particularly in the conflict with the Bosnian Croats. 'There is a very serious risk that you may lose control of what is then done with those weapons that you have made available and which may be then used for purposes you never intended,' he said.
LOS ANGELES - Sead Bekric, 14, blinded by shellfire, was flown from Bosnia for treatment in the US. But the boy's blistered eyes will probably never see again, AP reports.
One doctor at UCLA's Jules Stein Eye Institute said yesterday his chances of regaining sight were 'very poor.' Sead's left eye is completely gone and his right eye was badly damaged. After six hours of surgery, 'our worst fears were realised last night,' said Dr Robert Goldberg. 'The eyeball itself was pulverized and the bones were in tiny fragments.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments