UN investigating 58 suspected North Korean cyberattacks valued at £2.3bn
UN experts say money reportedly being used by North Korea to help fund its development of weapons of mass destruction
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UN experts say they are investigating 58 suspected North Korean cyberattacks between 2017 and 2023 valued at approximately $3bn (£2.3bn), with the money reportedly being used to help fund its development of weapons of mass destruction.
And the high volume of cyberattacks by North Korean hacking groups who report to the Reconnaissance General Bureau, North Korea’s primary foreign intelligence organization, is reportedly continuing, the panel of experts said in the executive summary of a new report to the UN Security Council obtained on Friday by The Associated Press.
The report covering the period from July 2023 to January 2024 and reflecting contributions from unidentified UN member nations and other sources, was sent to the 15-member council as North Korean leader Kim Jong-un has raised tensions in the region. He is threatening to annihilate South Korea if provoked and escalating weapons demonstrations. In response, the United States, South Korea and Japan have strengthened their combined military exercises.
Amid the increased military and political tensions on the Korean Peninsula, the experts said North Korea “continued to flout (UN) sanctions,” further developed its nuclear weapons, and produced nuclear fissile materials – the weapons’ key ingredients.
The experts said a light-water reactor at North Korea’s main nuclear complex at Yongbyon “appeared to be operational”. South Korea’s defense minister said in late December that the reactor would probably be formally operational by the summer, amid suspicions the North may use it as a new source of fissile materials for nuclear weapons.
North Korea has long produced weapons-grade plutonium from its widely known 5-megawatt reactor at Yongbyon. The light-water reactor would be an additional source of bomb fuels, and observers say its bigger capacity could allow it to produce more plutonium. Yongbyon has a uranium enrichment facility as well.
The panel said activities at North Korea’s Punggye-ri nuclear test site “continued”. US and South Korean officials have said North Korea is likely preparing to conduct its seventh nuclear test from the site, which would be the first since 2017.
Outside estimates on the size of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal vary, ranging from 20-60 to more than 100. Experts say North Korea can add six to 18 bombs each year. Since his diplomacy with the U.S. collapsed in 2019, Mr Kim has repeatedly vowed to build more nuclear weapons and introduce high-tech weapons to cope with what he calls intensifying US hostility.
The panel said that during the six-month period ending in January, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea or DPRK – the North’s official name – launched at least seven ballistic missiles, one a three-stage intercontinental ballistic missile, one possibly an intermediate-range missile and five short-range ballistic missiles.
After two failed attempts, the DPRK successfully placed a military observation satellite in orbit, the experts said. And a diesel submarine was retrofitted as a “tactical nuclear attack submarine” and added to the North’s military arsenal.
The panel, which monitors UN sanctions against North Korea, said the DPRK continues importing refined petroleum products in violation of Security Council resolutions, using “combinations of obfuscation methods” to evade maritime sanctions.
The DPRK’s recorded trade volume in 2023 surpassed the total for 2022, the experts said, including a large variety of consumer goods, “some of which could be classified as luxury items” that are banned by UN sanctions.
The panel said it is also investigating reports from member states about the DPRK supplying arms and ammunition in violation of UN sanctions.
The United States, Ukraine and six allies accused Russia last month of using North Korean ballistic missiles and launchers in a series of devastating aerial attacks against Ukraine, in violation of UN sanctions.
South Korea’s military said in November that it suspected North Korea had sent an unspecified number of short-range ballistic missiles, anti-tank missiles and portable anti-air missiles to Russia, in addition to rifles, rocket launchers, mortars and shells in violation of UN sanctions.
During the six-month period, the experts said, “trends include DPRK targeting of defense companies and supply chains, and increasingly sharing infrastructure and tools”.
The panel said it also investigated reports of numerous DPRK nationals working overseas, including in information technology, restaurants and construction, and earning income in violation of UN sanctions.
And in another sanctions violation, they said, “The DPRK continues to access the international financial system and engage in illicit financial operations.”
UN sanctions are not supposed to hurt ordinary North Koreans, but the panel said “there can be little doubt that UN sanctions and their implementation have unintentionally affected the humanitarian situation and some aspects of aid operations”. But it said “their relative role remains impossible to disaggregate from many other factors”.