Swiss Bill to unravel bosses' secret code
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Swiss parliament is this week debating a Bill aimed at eliminating the elaborate code that employers use to communicate with each other when writing job references.
"You'd be lucky to get Mr Jones to work for you" is a typical piece of double entendre addressed by the measure.
The practice might spare the former employee's feelings, but critics claim it makes it impossible for potential bosses in Switzerland to assess whether they should hire the worker. Ultimately it is also, they say, unfair to Mr Jones, who thinks he is getting a good reference.
The motion tabled to the Swiss upper house calls for an end to what its sponsors call an "undignified" and untenable habit. A new book on the subject provides Swiss job hunters with a guide to the traps set for them in a country where human resources managers take references very seriously.
According to Job References and their Secret Codes, "shows great sympathetic understanding towards his colleagues" means "constantly looking for dates from co-workers".
Alexander Tschaeppaet, author of the Bill, said references should be true, clear and complete. Some at present were discriminatory. "He shows the greatest sensitivity towards his colleagues" apparently means the applicant is a homosexual.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments