Russian mathematician rejects $1m prize
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Russian mathematician has rejected a $1m (£700,000) prize for solving one of the most challenging problems because he considers it unfair.
Grigory Perelman, 44, said yesterday that he told the Clay Mathematics Institute in Cambridge, Massachusetts, that he was turning down the prize for solving the Poincare conjecture, which has baffled academics for a century.
The reclusive Dr Perelman, who previously refused the prestigious Fields Medal, told Interfax news agency that he believes his contribution was no greater than that of the US mathematician Richard Hamilton, who first suggested a programme for the solution of the Poincare conjecture.
The Clay Mathematics Institute confirmed on its website that Dr Perelman had informed it of his refusal to accept the prize. The Poincare conjecture deals with shapes that exist in four or more dimensions.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments