Judge says Russian-made missile may have hit Malaysian airliner MH17 in Ukraine crash that killed 298
‘Experts have stated that the impact on the hull is compatible with a BUK missile system and a BUK warhead,’ says Hendrik Steenhuis as murder trial of four fugitive suspects considers evidence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The judge presiding over a murder trial concerning the downing of Malaysian airliner MH17 over eastern Ukraine has said there is evidence that the plane was hit by a Russian-made missile.
Four fugitive suspects – three Russians and a Ukrainian citizen – are being tried in absentia in a secure courtroom in the Netherlands over the incident of 17 July 2014 in which a Boeing 777 passenger plane, en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, was brought down – killing all 298 people on board.
MH17 crashed into a field in territory held by pro-Russian separatists, who were engaged in fighting against Ukrainian forces at the time.
“Experts have stated that the impact on the hull is compatible with a BUK missile system and a BUK warhead. No damage was found that would not be compatible with that scenario, or that would indicate another scenario,” Judge Hendrik Steenhuis said.
A team of international investigators spent years collecting evidence from the crash site and concluded in May 2018 that the missile launcher used to shoot down the aircraft had belonged to Russia’s 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade, based in Kursk.
The Dutch government holds Moscow responsible for the disaster but Russia denies any involvement.
After a year of mostly procedural hearings beginning last March, judges announced the start of the evidence phase on Monday.
This week the panel of judges will specifically look to determine what type of missile hit the airplane, where it was fired from and whether the four suspects – Oleg Pulatov, Igor Girkin and Sergei Dubinsky and Leonid Kharchenko – can be held responsible for the atrocity.
“Today, it is about: was it a BUK missile or not?” Hans de Borst, who lost his daughter in the crash, said before the hearing, which was attended by a number of people who lost relatives in the disaster.
“I think the question is already answered but the court is now really answering it, so it’s important.”
Introducing the evidence phase of proceedings on Monday, Judge Steenhuis told the court: “Up until today no one has come forward and said they are even partially responsible for the crash of MH17.
“The hearing being public is important to society in general, and to the relatives particularly, that there will be clarity about the result of the investigation after years of investigation.”
The court would be highlighting key parts of the evidence and not going over every part in court, the judge warned.
“The file consists of 65,000 pages, and many hundreds of hours of video and audio recordings. It’s such a large case it’s simply not possible to speak about every detail,” he said.
The presiding judges visited the reconstructed, shrapnel-pierced wreckage of MH17 at the Gilze-Rijen military airbase for the first time last month and described the experience as an “emotionally loaded” day.
Additional reporting by agencies
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments