European court rules Russia's 'gay propaganda' law encourages homophobia
Government ‘reinforcing stigma and prejudice’ with legislation, judges say
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Russia’s so-called gay propaganda law reinforces “stigma and prejudice” and violates the right to freedom of expression, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) has ruled.
The law, which bans the promotion of homosexual behaviour to minors, has been in place since 2013.
Gay rights groups have condemned it as discriminatory and warned the law is often used as a tool to target and intimidate the LGBT community in Russia.
Following a major court battle that ended on Tuesday, judges at the court agreed, saying that by adopting the law Russian authorities were encouraging homophobia.
They said the government had “overstepped the margin of appreciation" of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights that guarantees freedom of expression.
In its defence, the Russian government claimed “that regulating public debate on LGBT issues may be justified on the grounds of the protection of morals”.
But the ECHR found in favour of three gay activists who claimed the law violated the rights to freedom of expression and prohibition of discrimination under the European Convention on Human Rights.
The court rejected the government’s claim that regulating public debate on LGBT issues had been justified by the need to protect morals, and said they had failed to demonstrate how freedom of expression would devalue “traditional families”, as Russian officials had claimed.
The judges said there was a “clear European consensus about the recognition of individuals’ right to openly identify themselves as gay, lesbian or any other sexual minority, and to promote their own rights and freedoms”.
Commenting on the claim that minors could be “converted” to homosexuality, the court found that the Russian government had been “unable to provide any explanation of the mechanism by which a minor could be enticed into ‘[a] homosexual lifestyle’, let alone science-based evidence that one’s sexual orientation or identity was susceptible to change under external influence”.
One of the claimants, Nikolai Alexeyev, a leading gay rights activist, described the ruling as “an enormous court victory for LGBT people in Russia”.
Along with two others involved in the case, Nikolai Bayev and Alexei Kiselyov, Mr Alexeyev had staged demonstrations to defend gay rights – for which he and others had been fined – and unsuccessfully applied for permission to hold gay pride parades in Russia.
The court said: “In staging their demonstrations, the applicants had not sought to interact with minors, nor intrude into their private space.
“Nothing on their banners had been inaccurate, sexually explicit or aggressive; nor could their messages have been interpreted as an invitation for tuition on gender issues.”
The adoption of the views expressed by the gay activists could “only be conducive to social cohesion”, the judges added.
“By adopting such laws the court found that the authorities had reinforced stigma and prejudice and encouraged homophobia, which was incompatible with the values – of equality, pluralism and tolerance – of a democratic society.”
The Strasbourg-based court oversees the application of the European Convention on Human Rights to the 47 members of the Council of Europe, of which Russia is a member.
However, it is unclear what impact the ruling will have. Although the court’s rulings are binding, Russia passed a law in 2015 saying that its constitution superseded ECHR rulings.
In a recent case, Russia’s constitutional court said an ECHR ruling ordering a compensation payment to shareholders of a defunct oil company could not be enforced.
A Kremlin spokesman said the government would “review” the court’s latest ruling.
Russia’s justice ministry also expressed its “disagreement with the conclusions of the European court” in a statement.
Homosexuality was decriminalised in Russia in 1993, but anti-gay sentiment remains strong, including in the Russian federal republic of Chechnya, which has been the subject of international condemnation following the systemic abuse of gay men.
Vladimir Putin claimed in a recent interview that the “gay propaganda” law was intended to “provide children with the opportunity to grow up without impacting their consciousness.
“When they grow up, they may take any decision on their future, including private and sexual ones.”
Denis Krivosheev, Amnesty International’s Europe and Central Asia research deputy director, backed the ECHR ruling, saying the legislation “has always been nothing short of homophobic”.
He told The Independent: “The law is blatantly discriminatory and violates the right to freedom of expression, and its introduction has undoubtedly contributed to homophobia and violence targeting LGBTI people in Russia.
“We strongly welcome today’s ruling, not least given the renewed urgency over investigating the reports of a terrifying campaign of mass abduction and torture of gay men in Chechnya.
“We reiterate our call on the Russian authorities to repeal its homophobic legislation, end discriminatory practices and fully respect every person’s right to freedom of expression.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments