Russia fails Council of Europe test
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.RUSSIA'S democratic credentials suffered an embarrassing blow yesterday with publication of a report that found Moscow unfit for membership of the Council of Europe.
Passing the rigorous application criteria for the council, based on the rule of law and respect for human rights, is the most esteemed sign of a country's political maturity. For eastern European states, for whom membership of the European Union is far off and fully-fledged integration with Nato remains problematic, speedy membership of the council is an important goal.
But a panel of human rights lawyers and legal experts representing the 32 members of the council have served notice that Russia must introduce legal reforms before its membership application can be considered. The report notes the 'particularly acute . . . problem of organised crime', but cites the central problem as respect for the rule of law.
Constitutionally guaranteed rights, it concludes, 'seem to be more theory than practice. In many important fields the essential legal codifications have not yet been reformed as planned . . . traditional authoritarian thinking still seems to be dominant . . . the concept that it should . . . be for the judiciary to protect the individual has not yet become a reality in Russia.'
The new secretary-general of the council, Daniel Tarschys, recently said that he expected the council to welcome some new members, including Russia, by next year. Yesterday's report is thus less of a death blow to Moscow's hopes than a warning that, to be successful, reform must be speedily introduced.
'It is vital to bring Russia into the fold quickly to add to international pressure for greater democracy, but lower standards would weaken the council; it would risk collapsing under its own weight,' one Western diplomat said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments