Putin offers radical cuts in missiles if US halts Star Wars
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Russia and the US should cut their nuclear arsenals well below the 1,500 level he had previously advocated, President Vladimir Putin said yesterday, in a radical arms proposal.
Russia and the US should cut their nuclear arsenals well below the 1,500 level he had previously advocated, President Vladimir Putin said yesterday, in a radical arms proposal.
"It's not the limit; we are ready to consider lower levels in the future," Mr Putin said in a statement issued by the Kremlin. "We don't see reasons which would hamper further deep cuts in strategic offensive weapons. There should be no pause in nuclear disarmament."
Russia is aware it no longer has the resources to maintain its nuclear arsenal at its present level. The number of missiles it can maintain will inevitably drop, regardless of arms treaties, as its force ages and cannot be replaced.
Mr Putin said that each side could reduce the number of warheads it can use to the 1,500 level by 2008, though only if the US does not go ahead with its anti-ballistic missile defence system. In April the Russian parliament finally ratified, after years of delay, the Start II treaty which would cut arsenals to 3,500 warheads each.
As soon as the treaty is implemented both sides have tentatively agreed to a Start III treaty which would make further cuts, down to the 2,000-2,500 level. Russia currently spends just $5.1bn (£3.6bn) on defence compared to $290bn spent by the US.
The inability of Russia to maintain the depleted forces it inherited from the Soviet Union was underlined last week when its security council decided to cut military establishment by 600,000 or a fifth.
Earlier, the head of Russia's Strategic Missile Forces, proposed the US and Russia include both offensive and defensive missiles as part of their strategic arsenals. If either country built defensive missiles it would have to cut its offensive force.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments