Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

'New Europe' threatens space centre veto

Stephen Castle
Tuesday 12 December 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Divisions between old and new Europe were reignited yesterday as the Czech Republic went into battle against western European countries over the site of an EU space agency.

The dispute, which threatens to derail a summit of European leaders tomorrow, has echoes of previous bitter arguments over the allocation of EU bodies - which bring prestige as well as millions in revenue.

This time the authorities in Prague have threatened to veto any decision which hands the new authority supervising Galileo, the EU's satellite navigation project, to an old EU country.

Cardiff is a front-runner from old Europe - one of 11 potential sites including Barcelona and Munich.

The horse-trading that surrounds the siting of European agencies is legendary and has provoked spectacular bust-ups.

On one occasion the former Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi, blocked Finland from gaining a European food safety agency, claiming "Finns don't even know what prosciutto is".

After deadlock over the site for the Galileo supervisory authority at a meeting yesterday, Prague accused old EU countries of reneging on a deal under which the new, mainly former Communist, nations were promised priority over future decisions.

The Czech Prime Minister, Mirek Topolanek, plans to raise Prague's candidacy for the agency at tomorrow's meeting of the European Council, where all 25 EU heads of government will gather. He points to a pledge made by EU heads of government in 2003, when they agreed to carve up sites of a host of agencies among themselves, shortly before the 10 new member states joined the union.

At the time, the EU leaders said that as far as future decisions were concerned, they would "agree to give priority to acceding states".

The Czech Transport minister, Ales Rebicek, said yesterday the deal had been called into question by "all of the countries that are candidates" and by "a group of old member countries". Jana Reinisova, the deputy ambassador of the Czech Republic to the EU, said that in "some way it will be raised at the [European] council".

Two other new member states have put forward potential sites for the authority: Slovenia, which proposed Ljubljana, and Malta, which bid for Valletta. Jan Kohout, the Czech ambassador to the EU, said Cardiff's bid was the strongest from old Europe.

The Czechs are angry that some old member states have raised the issue of security for the agency. Galileo is the rival to the US global satellite navigation system and the inference is that the new member states might allow America access to secret information.

Finland, which holds the EU presidency, said it would try to avoid making Galileo a summit issue. It knows that debate could degenerate into an angry dispute.

Susanna Huovinen, Finland's Transport minister, said the 2003 decision to prioritise the new nations should apply unless EU heads of government overturned it. "The matter will not be on the agenda of this week's summit," she said.

Though the presidency can control the agenda, it cannot prevent a head of government raising any issue he or she wants.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in