Maastricht marijuana is for locals only, rules EU
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.No drugs please, you're foreigners.
The Dutch city of Maastricht is within its legal rights to ban tourists from buying marijuana in its coffee shops, a senior EU official has ruled.
The advocate general of the European Court of Justice decided that the right to free trade and free movement within the European Union has its limits. It cannot be applied to illegal substances such as marijuana, Yves Bot ruled yesterday.
If the ruling is upheld by the European Court in the next few months, the decision will allow the Dutch city to maintain a five-year-old ban on cannabis sales to tourists from neighbouring countries. Other Dutch cities may then follow suit.
The Netherlands has tolerated small over-the-counter sales of marijuana through "coffee shops" for many years, even though the drug remains illegal.
Marc Josemans, chairman of the Association of Official Maastricht Coffee Shops, challenged the by-law in a Dutch court. The Dutch sought the opinion of the European Court.
Maastricht had a right, Mr Bot said, to regard the 20,000 foreigners a day visiting the town as a "genuine and sufficiently serious threat to public order". The by-law was therefore "necessary ... in the face of troubles caused by drug tourism" and also helped to "combat the illicit trade in narcotics in the EU".
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments