Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Julian Assange's lawyers prepare for the case against Sweden's legal system

 

Shaun Walker
Thursday 31 May 2012 04:25 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

It now seems inevitable that it will be Sweden that deals with Julian Assange, and the Scandinavian country's legal system has been the focus of extreme polemic in recent months. For some it is the model of how a democracy should run; while Mr Assange's lawyers and family have insisted that he will be at the mercy of an unfair and pre-judiced system.

Experts say Mr Assange may not be held in jail, but would probably have some kind of restriction on his movements, similar to his situation in the UK. His lawyers and family have raised concerns about the transparency of the process, given that sexual assault cases are held behind closed doors in Sweden.

Swedish prosecutors will want to interview Mr Assange, and there is even a chance that the case could be dropped. "It is possible that he may offer up an explanation for what happened that makes the prosecutor rethink how strong a case she has," said Chistopher Wong, a legal scholar at Lund University.

He said that much of the criticism of Sweden had come from the differing terminology used in the country. "Just because he's not been charged doesn't mean he's not a criminal suspect and there is evidence against him," said Mr Wong.

While many have rubbished Mr Assange's fears that he could be extradited to the US, a study of 9,000 Swedish lawyers found that 32 per cent agreed with his criticisms. The main issue is that defence lawyers are often not informed about the prosecution's case until minutes before it is presented in court.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in