Italian provincial court to rule on existence of Jesus
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.An Italian provincial court in the small town of Viterbo has taken a break from the usual diet of land disputes, divorces and theft to ponder an altogether bigger issue: did Jesus exist?
It may sound more like an adolescent essay question, but lawyers were yesterday laying out their arguments for and against a fundamental pillar of the Christian faith: that Jesus Christ was real and born of Mary in Bethlehem.
The case has grown out of an argument between two old friends, Enrico Righi Rever, a Catholic prelate, and Luigi Cascioli, a staunch atheist. Mr Cascioli maintains that a parish bulletin written by the priest in 2002 breaks the law. He has asked Judge Gaetano Mautone to consider two criminal charges against Fr Righi; that the parish priest abused "popular belief" by fraudulently deceiving his flock, and that he financially gained from claiming that a man called John of Gamala was actually Jesus Christ.
The charges have little chance of success in a country renowned for its deeply held Roman Catholic beliefs, but if they are thrown out Mr Cascioli says he intends to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights. "When somebody states a wrong fact, abusing the ignorance of the people, and gains from that, that is one of the gravest crimes," Mr Cascioli told reporters.
Fr Righi's lawyers say their client has every right to argue for Jesus's existence, and that they can cite a wealth of historical evidence, both Christian and non-Christian. "Don Righi is innocent because he said and wrote what he has a duty to say and write," said his lawyer, Severo Bruno.
A decision by Judge Mautone on whether there is a case to answer is expected Monday.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments