Howard bars Euro-justice access
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MICHAEL HOWARD, the Home Secretary, yesterday blocked a measure to assure Europe's citizens access to justice.
Mr Howard is resisting a move to guarantee the right of individuals to petition the European Court of Human Rights, and his view seemed to prevail at yesterday's Cabinet meeting, sources said.
Mr Howard, a prominent opponent of further European integration, opposes the move because of fears it would erode British sovereignty. The Court is part of the machinery of the Council of Europe, an organisation separate from the European Union and whose membership includes the countries of both West and East Europe.
The issue arises from a change in the European Human Rights Convention which is supposed to make justice easier and faster. The Convention covers a wide range of rights and has been frequently used by individuals against the Government. One key point in the reforms is to make it mandatory for governments to allow individuals to petition the Court. At present this is voluntary.
Mr Howard wants to keep the right of individual petition voluntary, thus retaining the Government's right to block British subjects' access to the Strasbourg-based institution if it so wished. Britain currently allows individual access, but could stop it. This could send the wrong signals to Central and Eastern European countries, allowing them to duck their human rights responsibilities, critics say.
'It is quite outrageous for the Government to have this grudging attitude towards individuals' access to justice,' said Joyce Quinn MP, Labour's European spokesperson, yesterday. 'To send this signal now is really quite shocking, especially coming from one of the oldest of democracies.' The issue is likely to be raised during a debate in Parliament today on the Council of Europe.
The Home Office and the Foreign Office are battling over whether the right of individuals should be mandatory or voluntary under a new international agreement, the sources say. The Foreign Office and Douglas Hurd want this made mandatory, but the Home Office wants it left open.
The Court has embarrassed the Government over issues ranging from prisoners' rights to Northern Ireland, many of which concern the Home Office. The Government has been challenged over the Prevention of Terrorism Act, pre-trial detention and between 1983 and 1991 had more cases brought against it and more adverse judgments than any other country.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments