Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Gazprom tower to 'dwarf' St Petersburg skyline

Andrew Osborn
Friday 21 July 2006 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

St Petersburg's graceful 18th-century Unesco-protected skyline is to be dwarfed by a modernist skyscraper rising to almost 1,000 feet, conceived as an icon of Russia's growing economic might.

Architects have warned that the tower will blight a city that is widely regarded as one of Europe's most beautiful metropolises, and imperil its precious Unesco rating. The offending building has been commissioned by the energy giant Gazprom, the world's largest producer of gas, and the project has won the backing of St Petersburg's powerful Governor, Valentina Matvienko.

The tower, known as "Gazprom City", is supposed to be a symbol of Russia's post-Soviet renaissance, and Ms Matvienko, an ally of President Vladimir Putin, has boasted that the structure will lift the city's prestige. "It will be a super-project," she said. "It will be a masterpiece."

The project has attracted influential critics, including the director of the city's famous Hermitage Museum, and the Russian Union of Architects, as well as archaeologists who are concerned that it is being built close to the historic and largely unexcavated remains of a 17th-century Swedish fortress.

The authorities will need to circumvent their own rules in order to erect the structure, since construction work within the fortress's vicinity is banned under federal law, and it is also forbidden to build anything higher than 160 feet in the area.

Critics argue that the structure will be visible from the city's main thoroughfare, Nevsky Prospekt, and that anyone within a 40-mile radius will be able to see what they are certain will be an eyesore. Controversially, it will be located on the opposite side of the river Neva from the acclaimed 18th-century Smolny Cathedral, designed by Francesco Rastrelli, the famous architect who also designed the Winter Palace.

It will also face the Smolny Institute, a former school for aristocratic girls, from where Vladimir Lenin directed the Russian revolution in 1917.

Detractors argue that it will be twice as high as the bell tower of the city's Peter and Paul Fortress, built on Tsar Peter the Great's orders, and that it will easily become St Petersburg's tallest structure. It will cost an estimated £325m to build, and investment on adjacent buildings and infrastructure will take the bill to more than £1bn.

The first phase of Gazprom City is due to be completed by 2010, and a short-list of world-famous architects to build it, including Lord Rogers, has been drawn up. A decision on its final design is expected in the autumn.

Gazprom and the city authorities argue that the complex, which will house the headquarters of other companies too, will create jobs and revive what has become a bleak industrial part of the city. They say its design will be world-class.

Change is inevitable, they argue, and cutting-edge "ambitious" projects like Gazprom City are always controversial at first.

But the Russian Union of Architects has penned a letter to Governor Matvienko urging her to reconsider: "St Petersburg's skyline is exclusively low-rise and dominated by horizontal lines in keeping with its lay-out," they wrote. "Building a 300m tower will inevitably destroy the harmony of the city's existing centuries-old, tall buildings - and cause irreparable loss to the city's fragile skyline. Other vertical structures will look like small toys."

And Mikhail Piotrovsky, director of the city's Hermitage Museum, is among those who oppose the project. "In St Petersburg, you should never build anything higher than the cornice of the Winter Palace," he said. "It was by chance that we inherited such an incredible city, and we should never mess around with it."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in