French deputies vote to overturn disabled ruling
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.French deputies approved a draft law yesterday reversing a controversial judgment that disabled children have, in effect, a right never to have been born.
French deputies approved a draft law yesterday reversing a controversial judgment that disabled children have, in effect, a right never to have been born.
Deputies voted almost unanimously to overturn a series of judgments by the Cour de Cassation, France's highest appeal court, saying disabled children have an automatic right to compensation if doctors fail to warn their parents of possible abnormalities in the womb.
The draft law now goes to the upper house. It states that disabled children "cannot claim a legal prejudice from the simple fact of having been born". It adds, however, that parents of a "severely handicapped child" can claim compensation if the child's condition was missed in pre-natal examination through "a serious medical error".
The draft law is an attempt to defuse a debate between parents of disabled children, who want legal redress for medical failures, and pressure groups who say the rulings are a statement that disabled people should be eliminated.
In 2000, a doctor was ruled liable for not warning a mother of the possible effects of German measles in pregnancy. Last year, the court found a doctor liable after failing to warn a mother that her child would have Down's syndrome.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments