Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Court blames woman for divorce after she stopped having sex with her husband

The case has reignited a debate in France over women's rights

The European Court of Human Rights ruled the French courts had violated the woman's right to respect for private and family life
The European Court of Human Rights ruled the French courts had violated the woman's right to respect for private and family life (Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A woman who was blamed by French courts for her divorce because she no longer had sex with her husband, has won an appeal in Europe's top human rights court.

The case has reignited a debate in France over women's rights.

The French woman - identified as Ms H.W, born in 1955 - brought her case to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in 2021 after exhausting legal avenues in France almost a decade following the divorce.

The ECHR ruled the French courts had violated the woman's right to respect for private and family life.

"In the present case, the Court could not identify any reason capable of justifying this interference by the public authorities in the area of sexuality," it said in a statement.

The ECHR ruling comes amid a period of soul-searching in France after the high-profile case of Gisele Pelicot, whose husband was found guilty of drugging his wife and inviting dozens of men over to their home to rape her.

Gisele Pelicot leaves the courthouse after hearing the verdict of the court that sentenced her ex-husband to the maximum term of 20 years jail
Gisele Pelicot leaves the courthouse after hearing the verdict of the court that sentenced her ex-husband to the maximum term of 20 years jail (AFP via Getty Images)

The case shocked the world, rekindled thorny debates about women's rights in France and turned Gisele Pelicot into a feminist icon.

In a statement released by her lawyer, Lilia Mhissen, H.W celebrated her legal victory.

"I hope this decision will mark a turning point in the fight for women's rights in France," she said. "It is now imperative that France, like other European countries, such as Portugal or Spain, take concrete measures to eradicate this rape culture and promote a true culture of consent and mutual respect."

Mhissen said the ECHR ruling has no impact on H.W.'s divorce, which is definitive. However, she said it will have a major impact on French law, preventing French judges from making similar divorce rulings in the future.

"This decision marks the abolition of the marital duty and the archaic, canonical vision of the family," she said in a statement. "Courts will finally stop interpreting French law through the lens of canon law and imposing on women the obligation to have sexual relations within marriage."

France's Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, which represented the French government in the case, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The woman, who married her husband in 1984 and had four children with him, wanted the divorce, but contested being blamed for the breakdown, arguing it was an unjust intrusion into her private life and a violation of her physical integrity.

She cited health problems and threats of violence from her husband as reasons for why she had not had intimate relations from 2004 onwards.

The fact that one of the couple's children was mentally and physically handicapped put added stress on the marriage.

H.W., who is from Le Chesnay near Paris, said she had been deeply traumatised by the ruling, which "legitimised a family environment where the privacy and dignity of women are ignored and flouted".

H.W.'s case was supported by two French women's activism groups.

Emmanuelle Piet, the head of one of them, the Feminist Collective Against Rape, said she was delighted.

"Ms. W spent fifteen years fighting this battle, and it ended in victory, bravo," she said. "When you are forced to have sexual relations in marriage, it is rape."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in