Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EU turns up its nose at attempt to trademark smell of strawberries

Elizabeth Davies
Thursday 27 October 2005 19:00 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The rush of trademark claims followed a successful bid by a Dutch perfume company that registered the aroma of freshly cut grass in 2000. It used the patent to make tennis balls smell as good as the courts upon which they bounce.

But Eden Sarl's claim to trademark the smell of strawberries for use in soaps and lotions was quashed yesterday by EU experts, who ruled that, as the fruit "does not have just one smell", its scent cannot be used as one company's unique selling point. "There is no generally accepted international classification of smells which would make it possible ... to identify an olfactory sign," the EU's second-highest court decided.

Sensory tests showed the plump red fruits can have up to five distinct scents. "This means ... that the different varieties of strawberries produce significantly different smells," said judges, much to the consternation of Eden Sarl, which had hoped to add strawberry-scented pens and stationery to its armoury of nasally enticing products.

The firm had argued that, while different varieties of fruit may taste differently, their smell, associated by so many in Europe with lazy summer picnics and the odd glass of champagne, remained the same. "The smell of ripe strawberries is stable and durable," Eden representatives said. "That smell is well-known to consumers who will have memories of it from childhood."

The company had asked the court to overrule the EU's trademark agency, which rejected a request made by another French firm to register the scent in May 2004.

The EU also rejected an attempt to register the image of a strawberry as a trademark. But it did acknowledge that, in certain circumstances, the use of a smell as a "non-conventional" trademark would be permitted.

"The olfactory memory is probably the most reliable memory that humans possess," the judge said. "Consequently, economic operators have a clear interest in using olfactory signs to identify their goods."

European laws on trademarking are notoriously more stringent than those in the rest of the world. Attempts to use raspberry as a trademark scent for perfumed candles, as well as the smells of lemon and vanilla, have also failed.

In 2000, the British company John Lewis tried to use the smell of cinnamon as a desirable addition to furniture polish but failed after the EU ruled that the smell of the spice was not "distinguishable" enough for trademark purposes.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in