El Castillo de Matrera: Spanish castle restoration in Cadiz labelled 'disastrous' by locals amid widespread ridicule
Work prompts comparison to botched attempt to restore 19th century fresco of Jesus Christ
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The restoration of an ancient Spanish castle has been mocked by locals - as conservationists declared the work a "heritage massacre".
El Castillo de Matrera was built in the ninth century on a hill top in Cadiz, and has been a National Monument since 1949.
After it was badly damaged by rainfall three years ago, architects set about the job of renovating the historic structure.
But Spaniards vented their frustration after photographs of the restored building were released, which showed new materials had been used to stabilise what remained of the original building.
One man told Spain's La Sexta news channel: “They’ve got builders in rather than restorers and, as we say round here, they’ve cocked it up.”
The project has prompted comparisons with the attempt to restore a 19th century Ecce Homo fresco of Jesus Christ by an elderly Christian woman in 2012.
Hispania Nostra, a Spanish cultural heritage organisation, described the results of the work on the castle as “absolutely terrible”.
A statement on the group's website said: “Foreigners have written to us saying they can’t understand why these follies – better described as heritage massacres – still go on.”
Architect Carlos Quevedo, who oversaw the restoration, defended his project - saying it met the goals that were set ahead of the project.
He also said it was against the law to "imitate" the castle, which explains the stark contrast between the original structure and the newly restored one.
“There were three basic aims,” he told the Guardian.
“To structurally consolidate those elements that were at risk; to differentiate new additions from the original structure – thus avoiding imitative reconstructions that are prohibited by the law; and to recover the volume, texture and tonality that the tower would originally have had."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments