Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EC aims to clamp down on refugees from Third World

Nick Cohen,Andrew Marshall
Wednesday 21 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

REFUGEES from Africa and Asia could find it all but impossible to find sanctuary in Europe, a leaked draft of European Community ministers' immigration proposals reveals.

Documents from the Ad Hoc Group on Immigration, which consists of politicians and civil servants from the Home Office and European interior ministries, suggests that harsh measures are being planned to keep Third World refugees out of the EC.

The draft, dated 1 July, considers the creation of an EC-wide definition of 'manifestly unfounded applications for asylum' which would be used by all member countries when deciding whether to accept or reject a claim for refugee status. It reaffirms existing policy that refugees must stay in the first safe country they reach and adds that 'intercontinental movements (of asylum- seekers) are seldom necessary for protection reasons'.

At present the 'safe-country rule' guarantees that the vast majority of Third World refugees live in border camps near their own countries. However, a minority are able to claim asylum in the EC if they can fly or sail directly to a European port or airport.

The draft says that in future these 'intercontinental' refugees will be generally ineligible for asylum. It adds that a refugee must prove that he or she could not seek redress for human rights violations in their own courts if an asylum claim were to be accepted by an EC state. This would mean, for example, that Kurds in Turkey would have to exhaust all 'effective legal remedies' before applying for asylum.

The Home Office, which is in charge of EC refugee policy during Britain's presidency of the Community, did not deny the leak was an accurate representation of the draft proposals. The documents were obtained by BBC Radio 4's Opinion programme which will broadcast further details today.

Charles Wardle, Parliamentary Under-Secretary at the Home Office, declined to comment on confidential discussions, but said a programme was under discussion to ensure genuine refugees in Europe were protected while common action was taken to deal with the 'present high levels of misuse of the asylum system'.

In a report issued earlier this week, the Minority Rights Group says Europe is raising national barriers to immigration and that there is a risk that the Community will assist this. 'Over the last decade the restrictions and barriers to the entry of asylum-seekers have tightened in all Western European states,' the report says. 'European harmonisation should not be used as a reason for further restrictions on refugees or asylum-seekers.'

The report argues that 'many of the details of the harmonisation process have been carried out in secrecy and are implemented in an underhand manner'. Immigration policy is not an area of European co-operation where Britain proposes to institute greater openness. A report from the Ad Hoc Group last December admitted that 'the impression remains that there is insufficient transparency in this area'.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in