Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Donald Tusk testifies in court over plane crash that killed Poland's president and 95 others

The European Council president and former Polish prime minister is locked in a political row with the country's government 

Jon Stone
Europe Correspondent
Monday 23 April 2018 10:16 EDT
Comments
Donald Tusk arrives at court to testify
Donald Tusk arrives at court to testify (REUTERS)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Donald Tusk has told a Polish court that he had no role in preparing an ill-fated flight that crashed in 2010 killing the country’s president and 95 others people – an incident which has loomed large over the country’s politics for eight years.

Testifying at a court in Warsaw the European Council president, who was prime minister of Poland at the time of the disaster, said it was “obvious” that he should not have been involved in such day-to-day planning.

The families of some of the victims of the crash blamed Mr Tusk’s government and sued officials, who they say did not make the necessary preparations to make the journey safe.

The trial, in which Mr Tusk is appearing as a witness and not a defendant, has become a major political issue in Poland. Observers say the country’s government, led by the right-wing populist Law and Justice party, is using it to undermine Mr Tusk.

“It is not and should not be the task of the prime minister or the president to influence any decisions as to place of the landing, the time of the landing, the destination, the type and the choice of the plane,” Mr Tusk told the panel of three judges.

“So from my point of view it was obvious that I should not be interested and should not be influencing.”

In testimony the senior European Union official, who represents member states' interests in Brussels, also praised the head of his office and officials, who have come under attack over the incident, for their work.

Lech Kaczynski, his wife the first lady, and many senior Polish officials and military leaders were killed in the crash on April 10, 2010.

Wreckage at the site of the Smolensk plane crash in 2010
Wreckage at the site of the Smolensk plane crash in 2010 (AP)

The incident happened near a makeshift airport in Smolensk, Russia while they were on the way to pay homage to the thousands of Polish officers killed by Soviet state security in 1940 during World War II.

Official investigations have said the crash was an accident but the leader of Law and Justice, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who is the late president’s twin brother, has blamed Mr Tusk and Russia for what happened and suggested it could have resulted from foul play.

Last year a court of appeal confirmed an 18-month suspended prison term for Poland’s deputy head of the Government Protection Office for irregularities in the downed flight and another plane journey taken by Mr Tusk himself three days earlier.

Poland’s government is currently engaged in a long-running dispute with Brussels over controversial changes to the country’s judiciary that the European Commission and others say will undermine the independence of the judiciary – including in constitutional courts that judge the validity of election results.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in