Delays hit rapid reaction force
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The European rapid reaction force will not be operational by its scheduled date next year, senior defence officials have revealed.
Shortfalls in a range of important areas from transport to countering nuclear, biological and chemical threats mean that the proposed force will be delayed, and that a new date will have to be set.
An official report into the the European Capabilities Action Plan (ECAP) shows that member states have typically met only 104 of 144 capability targets.
Leaders of the European Union decided at a summit in Helsinki in December 1999 to set up a corps of 60,000, which could be deployed for up to 12 months at a time, within 60 days and with air and naval support. A year later, in Brussels, Alain Richard, the French Defence Minister at the time, described the plan as "a decisive moment for Europe's role in the world".
The force would undertake a variety of missions from humanitarian assistance to peace-keeping. The US was worried that the rapid reaction force might lead to the dismemberment of Nato. There was also opposition from a number of European countries, including Britain, that feared the force would mark another step towards a European "superstate".
The defence officials said that EU countries spent €180bn on defence, so there was no shortage of money available, but that there were problems with the way it was used. Some countries are unwilling to switch resources from national defence to the multinational force.
The ECAP report stresses that a shortfall "does not imply that no capabilities have been committed towards 40 remaining areas; it means that not enough forces have been offered, or that they do not all meet the required readiness levels".
The action plan is an attempt to rectify the shortfalls by offering "multinational solutions". However, individual member states must take the lead in projects, which has led to some curious arrangements. Portugal, for instance, has taken the lead in special operations forces, rather than Britain, Germany or France, which have far more experience in the field.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments