Danish sperm donor sued by three-year-old 'son'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A SWEDISH boy aged three is suing the Danish man who allegedly donated the sperm that conceived him. The boy's lawyer, Per-Arvid Viklund, said he was confident of winning the case, the first to try to differentiate between father and sperm donor.
The story of the insemination, according to the mother, is as follows: Swedish law only allows for artificial insemination of married or co-habiting women. The single mother, now 30, therefore contacted a donor agency in Copenhagen, where laws are less restrictive. Swedish law also guarantees the right of the child to know the identity of the father, which Danish law does not.
The woman had two meetings with the man in a Danish hotel, where he ejaculated into a receptacle. Following conception, the two remained in contact by letter and telephone.
The boy's mother says the man never denied paternity.
But as the boy was growing up, the woman became unhappy at his not knowing his father, whom she has named in court.
'If you were single and childless and decided to have artificial insemination, you too might change your mind about the child not having a father a few years later,' Mr Viklund said.
The object of the suit is to oblige the man to provide a blood sample or other genetic proof of paternity. If successful, it would also force the father to pay child support.
But, Mr Viklund, insisted: 'This is not about financial need. It is about feelings.'
He added: 'The case has arisen because of conflicting legislation in different countries. In Sweden, when we consider the issue of paternity, we look primarily at the child's welfare.'
Under legally regulated insemination in Sweden, the donor cannot be sued for paternity, but must agree in writing to his name being available on request. Mr Viklund's argument is that the Dane knew the woman herself was inserting his sperm, and is therefore the father rather than just a donor.
Mr Viklund, acting under instructions from social workers in the child's home town of Bollnas, northern Sweden, said he believed the case would be the first of several, given that single Swedish women under existing legislation would have to venture abroad for artificial insemination.
Swedish legislation on family issues is the subject of constant debate. Sweden recently passed legislation to oblige men to take at least a month's paternity leave. Hitherto, couples were paid 'parental insurance' for 12 months' leave, to be divided as they saw fit.
Because men are generally more highly paid and career-orientated, the argument goes, many were reluctant to take a share of the leave. Under the new law, the couple will lose a month's payment if the man does not exercise his right.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments