Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chechens sceptical over 'vote for peace'

Sarah Karush
Saturday 22 March 2003 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Chechens are being told they can bring peace to their bloodstained patch of southern Russia with a vote for a new regional constitution today.

The Kremlin has advertised the referendum on the constitution, designed to cement Chechnya's place within Russia, as the key to peace. Critics contend it cannot supplant negotiations with separatists and say no fair vote is possible while the war rages.

Chechens are sceptical about the prospects for peace, but after a decade of war and lawlessness, many say they will try anything.

Russian forces fought an unsuccessful 1994-96 war against Chechen separatists. The Russians took control of most of Chechnya three years ago, but they still suffer daily guerrilla attacks.

Little is said about the content of the constitution, drafted under the guidance of Akhmad Kadyrov, the chief of Chechnya's Moscow-backed administration.

If it is passed, Kadyrov becomes acting president. Presidential elections could be held six months later, and parliamentary elections three months after that. However, the constitution sets no deadline for those votes – raising the spectre that the Moscow-appointed administration could rule indefinitely. (AP)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in