Cannibal given life for eating victim
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A cannibal who killed and ate an apparently willing male victim has been convicted of murder and jailed for life after a German court overturned a conviction of manslaughter on the grounds it was too lenient. Armin Meiwes, 44, the "Cannibal of Rotenburg" had been sentenced to eight and-a-half years in 2004 for killing and eating Bernd Jurgen Brandes, 43, a homosexual computer engineer whom he met via the internet.
Judges at the first trial said they based their verdict of manslaughter on defence evidence which suggested Meiwes' victim had volunteered to be eaten and killed. Meiwes maintained that he would "never have touched" his victim had he not wanted to be killed.
But an appeal court in Frankfurt overturned the original verdict yesterday, arguing that at his first trial, judges had overlooked key prosecution evidence which showed that Meiwes killed for sexual pleasure. "Meiwes slaughtered his victim like a piece of livestock and treated him as an object of his fancy," the state prosecutor said.
Defence lawyers admitted that Meiwes had a fetish for human flesh but maintained he was not a danger to society.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments