Cabinet papers haunt currency celebrations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.After all the fanfares and the ceremonies a stark warning has emerged from the past to taunt Britain's euro enthusiasts still recovering from celebrating the single currency's arrival.
Internal links
12 facts to bank on with new currency
Cabinet faultlines are clear on this most divisive issue
Cabinet papers haunt currency celebrations
Europe has embarked on a grand experiment
All you need to know about the euro, and what it means
Nato helps out as Kosovo ditches the Deutschmark
After all the fanfares and the ceremonies a stark warning has emerged from the past to taunt Britain's euro enthusiasts still recovering from celebrating the single currency's arrival.
Released from Whitehall's archives under the 30-year secrecy rule, confidential cabinet papers warn that if Britain joined what was then known as the Economic and Monetary Union, it would enjoy less power over its economic affairs than the average American state.
The cabinet sub-committee report, ordered by Edward Heath when he was Prime Minister to consider the financial implications of the Government's approach to Europe, concludes that the union held "revolutionary long-term implications, both economic and political".
Correctly forecasting that the issue was likely to become the "central point of political controversy" because of the strong feelings it would provoke about loss of sovereignty, its final conclusions make gleeful reading for euro sceptics.
"At the ultimate stage economic sovereignty would to all intents and purposes disappear at a national level and the community would itself be the master of overall economic policy," it says.
The report would also have made uncomfortable reading for Sir Edward, who was beginning a sustained campaign to soften British attitudes to Europe in preparation for entry to the EEC in 1973.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments