Bulgaria denies fan's appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A British football fan jailed in Bulgaria for the attempted murder of a barman had his sentence reduced from 15 to 10 years yesterday, but was denied a retrial.
Michael Shields, 19, was jailed last year after he was accused of taking part in a brawl in the Black Sea resort of Golden Sands last May.
Shields denied he took part in the attack, saying he was asleep in the hotel when the incident occurred. He had been on holiday there after watching Liverpool win the Champions League in Turkey.
In July last year Graham Sankey, 20, also from Liverpool, signed a confession to the attack, which was sent to the Bulgarian authorities, in which he admitted throwing a slab which seriously injured a barman. Mr Sankey's solicitor now says he was referring to a different brawl.
Shields' father, also called Michael, who was in Bulgaria to hear the verdict, said: "We are so angry and disappointed ... we were hoping the court would overturn the conviction, or give him a retrial so he could prove his innocence."
Shields appealed against his conviction to Bulgaria's supreme court last month. But the court reimposed a fine of £71,000, which had been reduced to £42,000 at an earlier appeal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments