Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A French 'no' will break Europe says Mitterrand

Julian Nundy
Tuesday 14 July 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE FRENCH President, Francois Mitterrand, told the nation yesterday that it would 'break Europe' if it rejected the Maastricht treaty. Interviewed on television to mark Bastille Day, Mr Mitterrand said that a 'no' vote on ratification in the French referendum on 20 September would 'put an end to 45 years of France's foreign policy'. It 'would break Europe, because there would be no more impetus, no one would believe in it anymore'.

An opinion poll published last week showed that 42 per cent of voters planned to vote for ratification, while 32 per cent were against, the highest figure so far. The other 26 per cent were undecided or planned to abstain.

Mr Mitterrand's fear is one that is expressed across the French political spectrum: that a rejection of Maastricht by France, which Mr Mitterrand described as 'a motor' of Europe, would not just halt European construction at its current stage but destroy all that the EC has achieved so far.

Mr Mitterrand said the position of France, one of the six original founders of the EC, 'was decisive' for Europe. A rejection of the Maastricht European union treaty would herald a return to nationalism and 'the risk of conflicts' on the continent, he said.

While few French politicians will say so publicly, in private they express concern that a rejection of Maastricht would particularly affect Germany, which has invaded France three times in the past 120 years, turning it away from European construction to dwell on its internal problems.

'German public opinion is already drifting away from the Community,' one leader of the conservative Union for French Democracy (UDF) said recently. 'We must not leave Germany face-to- face with itself. That would be playing with fire. France is obsessed by Germany.' Reacting to Mr Mitterrand's words, Philippe de Villiers, a rare anti-Maastricht campaigner in the UDF, said the President had 'used the big artillery of politicians' propaganda' in an attempt 'to frighten the French on the theme of 'Maastricht or chaos' . . . '

Mr Mitterrand was speaking after presiding over the annual Bastille Day parade along the Champs-Elysees. Among the novelties this year was a flypast by a Transall transport plane, painted in UN white. The aircraft is being used to ferry aid to Sarajevo.

Another was a rendering of the 'Marseillaise' by the French Army choir and 500 members of the three branches of the armed forces to mark the anthem's 200th anniversary this year. The 'Marseillaise' is currently a subject of controversy, since some critics believe its words are too blood-curdling for the modern world. Danielle Mitterrand, the President's wife, is a member of a committee working on the words.

One suggestion is to Maastrichtise the anthem, replacing, for example, 'your bloody ramparts are fallen' with 'no more frontiers with our European neighbours'. If, however, the committee is successful, the changes will probably have to go to a referendum, as the text is enshrined in the Constitution.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in