Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

€1 fine for paparazzi at Diana's fatal crash

John Lichfield
Wednesday 22 February 2006 20:00 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

A French court has ordered three photographers to pay symbolic damages of €1 (68p) for taking pictures of Dodi Fayed and Diana, Princess of Wales, on the night of their fatal car accident in 1997.

The ruling by the Paris appeal court is, depending on interpretation, a vindication, or a slap in the face, for Dodi's father, Mohamed Al Fayed, who forced the case to be reopened last year.

The three press photographers, Jacques Langevin, Fabrice Chassery and Christian Martinez, will have to pay Mr Al Fayed €1 between them, but must also pay up to €6,000 to cover the cost of publishing the court ruling in three French newspapers.

Mr Al Fayed, the owner of Harrods, had refused to accept two earlier French court rulings - in 2003 and 2004 - that the photographers were merely doing their job. Following an appeal by Mr Al Fayed, the highest court, the Cour de Cassation, overturned these rulings last year and ordered the case to be reheard.

Since Diana's relatives did not pursue the case, infringements of her own privacy were not considered.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in