Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Estimators weigh cost of a disaster

Paul Durman
Monday 17 January 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

INITIAL estimates suggested yesterday's Los Angeles earthquake could have caused dollars 5bn ( pounds 3.35bn) of damage, writes Paul Durman.

Lloyd's of London, the insurance market, drew a parallel with the San Fernando earthquake of 1971, which cost dollars 1.7bn, or about dollars 5bn at today's prices. Lloyd's said both quakes had roughly the same epicentre and measured 6.6 on the Richter scale.

However, many of the homeowners and businesses whose property was destroyed yesterday may be unable to claim. The threat of earthquakes makes insurance punitively expensive and many people are uninsured. The cost to the insurance industry is therefore expected to be substantially less than the total cost. Members of Lloyd's will not pick up any of the bill unless the insured cost rises beyond dollars 3.5bn.

Balcombe Group, usually among the first to estimate the costs of natural disasters, held back from quantifying the 'extensive' damage.

The world's costliest natural disaster was Hurricane Andrew in 1992, which caused dollars 20bn of damage.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in