Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

EARTHQUAKE IN JAPAN: THE CAUSES: `Early warning' system eludes scientists

Steve Connor
Tuesday 17 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The earthquake's destructiveness was due to its relatively shallow depth rather than magnitude, seismologists said yesterday. Its epicentre also struck almost directly beneath a city with traditional timber-framed houses and heavy tiled roofs whic h collapsed easily and burned readily in a conflagration caused by fractured gas and fuel pipes.

The British Geological Survey in Edinburgh said the earthquake measured 7.2 on the Richter scale. "We get about 20 of them a year worldwide, so it's not that big," Alice Walker, a survey seismologist, said.

But it struck at a relatively shallow depth of 30km almost directly beneath the city, which sent seismic waves to the surface that shook and splintered buildings, roads and mains.

"Usually the earthquakes in Japan are deeper and so produce less impact at the surface," Ms Walker said. The last great earthquake to hit Japan, in 1923, measured 8.2 and killed an estimated 143,000 people after fires consumed most of Tokyo. Like the 192

3 quake, most of the deaths in Kobe can be attributed to fires.

Scott Steedman, director of engineering at Gibb consulting engineers in Reading, said the older timber houses in Japan made its cities especially vulnerable.

Dr Steedman, who has just returned from Japan, said its level of preparedness is probably the best in the world. A programme is also underway to strengthen older timber-framed housing. "The problem is it takes time. It takes generations to strengthen theentire building stock.''

Japan lies in one of the most active regions for earthquakes. It sits at the junction of three tectonic plates - the Pacific, Eurasian and Philippine Sea plates - that are slowly sliding into one another. This creates stresses in rock which are periodically released as earthquakes.

The principal movements are due to the "subduction" of the Pacific plate from the east under the Eurasian plate in the west. A great tongue of land descends up to 300km under Japan at an angle of about 40 degrees, melting the rock as it descends.

Japan owes its existence to this geological process. As molten rock rises to the surface it causes volcanic outcrops that have risen above sea level.

Wayne Thatcher, a seismologist at the US Geological Survey in Menlo Park, California, said the Kobe earthquake happened on a minor fault above the major subduction zone. "It is an area with a strike-slip fault where there is lateral movement rather than vertical movement," he said.

About 1,500 earthquakes are recorded each year in Japan but only a quarter are strong enough to be felt at the surface. Violent earthquakes are less frequent, heavy ones occurring once every 10 or 30 years.

Attempts to predict earthquakes have largely failed. Although seismologists can estimate the probability of an earthquake in a particular area, they cannot give a time or date, rending their predictions useless in practice. Research aimed at improving the accuracy of predictions rests on being able to identify any seismic signs of an impending earthquake, yet many earthquakes have occurred without any precursory seismic movements.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in