Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

De Klerk 'sorry' for apartheid era

Mary Braid Cape Town
Wednesday 21 August 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

FW de Klerk, the former South African president and leader of the party which invented apart-heid, yesterday offered an historic official apology. However, as sorries go, it was heavy with qualification and defiance.

At a special hearing of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, Mr de Klerk, on behalf of the National Party, accepted responsibility for the conditions which allowed the atrocities of the apartheid years to take place. For that he was "genuinely" remorseful.

But he passed the buck for the countless murders and political assasinations. The NP government had never authorised its security forces to commit murder, torture, rape, assas- sination or assault, he said.

The long-awaited submission sparked cheers of "viva de Klerk" from the hall in Cape Town, packed with NP supporters, including many Cape coloureds. It did nothing to placate the small ANC demonstration outside, brandishing placards asking "How many did you murder, PW Botha?"

"What de Klerk says is not enough," said one demonstrator. "We want to know how many died. How many did the government kill?"

There is little hope of an answer from former President Botha. He has retired to a place called Wilderness and apparently does not recognise the commission. In his submission, Mr de Klerk said he had made serious attempts to get Mr Botha to co-operate with the NP submission but he had refused. It seems unlikely that he will be forced to give evidence.

According to Mr de Klerk, the government did adopt "unconventional strategies" for dealing with "revolutionary forces". But he said: "I have never been part of any decision taken by Cabinet, the State Security Council or any committee authorising or instructung the commission of such gross violations of human rights."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in