Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Crisis talks to avert Montenegro split

Steve Crawshaw
Tuesday 13 July 1999 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE RULING parties of Serbia and Montenegro - the only two republics left in the shrunken Yugoslav federation - meet in Belgrade today for last-ditch talks intended to head off a likely Montenegrin bid for independence.

The possibility of Montenegrin secession would have seemed unthinkable until a couple of years ago. The relations between Serbia and Montenegro have been close - much closer than between any of the other six republics of the old Yugoslavia - but are nowdangerously fragile.

In the Montenegrin capital, Podgorica, the reformist government of President Milo Djukanovic has proposed the creation of a looser federation - "our last offer", as the Foreign Minister, Branko Perovic, described it to The Independent - which will be discussed in Belgrade today. If Serbia fails to compromise, a referendum on independence will be held within the next few months.

The Belgrade propaganda machine has trained its heavy guns on Montenegro in recent days, in moves reminiscent of the campaigns against the Croatian and Bosnian governments at the beginning of the Balkan wars. Politika, the pro-government daily, this week declared: "Podgorica's insistence on pursuing its dispute with officials in the Yugoslav capital is a cover for manipulation, hiding a much deeper conspiracy that could be the undoing of Montenegro and of Djukanovic as well."

Belgrade has sought to create an armed federal police in Montenegro, which the Montenegrin government fears could be used against the elected authorities. Montenegrin officials claim that about a hundred pro-Milosevic loyalists are being recruited daily.

A statement by the general staff of the Yugoslav Army condemned "political propaganda" on the possible use of the army against Montenegro, and said that the army was a "depoliticised state institution". Most observers would argue that the army has, on the contrary, been deeply politicised on behalf of the Milosevic regime.

Even if theoretical agreement is reached today, the problems are not over. Mr Djukanovic's coalition partners in Podgorica insist the time for talking to Belgrade has passed - at least while Mr Milosevic remains in power.

In some respects, that appears to be the view of Mr Djukanovic himself. Earlier this year, he told The Independent that Montenegro would not stay in the Yugoslav federation if Mr Milosevic remained in office. The political and economic cost, he argued, would be too high.

When Montenegrins look at the chaos of Serbia today, and note that Montenegro, because of its anti-Milosevic policies, suffered little bomb damage, they are more inclined to turn from the pro-Milosevic party of Momir Bulatovic, who is Yugoslav prime minister and opposition leader in Montenegro.

An independence vote would certainly be split. The north of Montenegro especially remains pro-Serb. This would provide an excuse to give weapons to pro-Belgrade rebels "in defence of the federation", as has happened elsewhere. The one point on which all sides are agreed is that a civil war here would be unimaginably bloody.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in