Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clinton urges free trade for cyberspace

Mary Dejevsky
Wednesday 02 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

When it comes to new technology, President Bill Clinton has admitted that he is still at the start of the learning curve: he said last month he would have his daughter, Chelsea, teach him how to use e-mail before she went to university in California this autumn.

But the US president's openness to the possibilities of computers and the Internet have persuaded him that for the time being at least, technological development, electronic information - and (just coincidentally) the interests of US-based companies like Microsoft that have pioneered the technology - should be given free rein.

After a White House meeting on Tuesday afternoon to consider a report on electronic commerce, Mr Clinton described the Net as an "engine for future economic growth". The US, he promised, would act "to ensure that international trade on the Internet remains free of new discriminatory taxes, free of tariffs, free from burdens and regulations, and safe from piracy".

The report, compiled in close consultation with industry leaders, including Microsoft's Bill Gates, had argued that no new taxes or tariffs be levied on transactions over the Net, and that government should not set technical standards. It would be left to the industry competition to determine the type of technology that would become dominant.

Mr Clinton acknowledged that some would want more regulation but, he said: "In many ways, electronic commerce is like the Wild West for the global economy."

The duty of government was "to ensure that it's safe and stable terrain for those who wish to trade on it" - but there its involvement would stop.

Naming Vice-President Al Gore as overseer of US Internet policy, Mr Clinton announced a series of initiatives to be enacted over the next 12 months. They included discussions with the World Trade Organisation to have the Net declared a global free-trade zone; work with the computer industry to develop technology and codes of conduct to ensure individuals' privacy, and encouragement to firms to develop "blocking" technology, like the "V-chip" to prevent children from seeing unsuitable material.

Mr Clinton's concerns on this score were heightened by the ruling of the Supreme Court last week that legislation already passed by Congress to censor the Net was unconstitutional. In attempting to protect children, the court decided, Congress had violated the rights of adults.

Recognising the strong lobbying power of the family values campaigners, Mr Clinton had pledged that some way - perhaps through technology - would be found to protect children from unsuitable material on the Net.

Mr Clinton's hands-off intentions towards the Net were praised by industry leaders. The president of America Online, Steve Case, said that "inconsistent and varied policies" regarding the Internet, including tax policy, could limit the ability of companies to participate in electronic commerce.

The administration will continue to restrict the sale of encryption devices, despite industry arguments that the technology will soon be so widespread that restrictions will be meaningless, and it has done little to enforce protection of copyright.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in