Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Clinton reprieve on sex charges

Rupert Cornwell
Friday 22 July 1994 19:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PRESIDENT Bill Clinton's lawyers have won a procedural victory in the Paula Jones case which is likely to put back any hearing into her sexual harassment charges at least until 1996 and probably until after the Presidential election that November.

With a nine-page ruling issued late on Thursday, Little Rock federal judge Susan Webber Wright sided with the Clinton defence team and declared she would first decide on whether a sitting president is immune from civil lawsuits, before allowing the case to go any further. Mr Clinton 'may or may not succeed' with his claim, she wrote, but such lawsuits could prove a distraction that could damage both his office and the interests of the country itself.

The ruling means that Mr Clinton will not have to file a formal response, dealing with the substance of the lurid allegations against him, until after the immunity issue is disposed of. The expectation is that the appeal process will go all the way to the Supreme Court. That alone would take up to two years, predicted Robert Bennett, the President's atttorney. Even if he ultimately loses, other appeals by Mr Clinton could delay hearings proper until after the election.

Ms Jones claims that Mr Clinton, when governor of Arkansas, exposed himself to her and requested oral sex in a Little Rock hotel room in May 1991. Mr Clinton denies meeting Ms Jones, then an Arkansas state employee. Declaring her case to be of a 'purely personal nature', the judge noted she had waited almost three years, until almost the last possible moment, to file her complaint.

The ruling is also expected to freeze the case against Danny Ferguson, the Arkansas state trooper and co-defendant, whom Ms Jones accuses of setting up the meeting with then Governor Clinton.

But respite from the President's embarrassments will be brief. Televised Congressional hearings into the Whitewater affair open on Tuesday. Although limited in scope, they will air new allegations that Mr Clinton last year improperly approached the Comptroller of the Currency, a top bank supervisory official, for advice on the issue, and potentially damaging evidence against Deputy Treasury Secretary Roger Altman, a close friend of Mr Clinton from their undergraduate days. Mr Altman was in charge of the ROTC, the federal body sorting out debris left by failed savings banks at the centre of the Whitewater affair.

Witnesses at the hearings, which begin in the House before shifting to the Senate Banking Committee on Thursday, are a virtual roll-call of the Clinton White House. Among those summoned to testify are advisers George Stephanopoulos and Thomas 'Mack' McLarty, White House Counsel Lloyd Cutler and his predecessor Bernard Nussbaum, and other top aides of both Mr and Mrs Clinton. Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen, as well as Mr Altman, is also expected to testify.

Although nothing damning is likely to emerge, the hearings will do nothing to enhance the President's sagging prestige. His approval rating now stands at a 12- month low of 42 per cent, while two-thirds of the population has doubts about his honesty.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in