Clinton fuels party rift on deficit-cutting plan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PRESIDENT Bill Clinton's manoeuvring to secure Capitol Hill approval for his deficit-cutting economic package has dragged him into a new and messy confrontation - this time between the two wings of his party, pitting more liberal House Democrats against the conservative-dominated Democratic majority in the Senate.
Bowing to the latter's unrelenting opposition, Mr Clinton has now formally dropped his original plan for a broadly-based BTU energy tax that would have taxed all types of fuel according to their heat content. But the result thus far has merely been to show the difficulties a weak President faces to win a big legislative battle, even when his party theoretically controls both houses of Congress.
Yesterday the Senate Finance Committee was examining a host of options to find the money and meet Mr Clinton's goal of cutting the deficit by dollars 500bn (pounds 340bn) over five years. They range from a straight petrol tax to more complex transport and electricity taxes, coupled with deeper cuts in welfare entitlements. All are favoured by conservative Senate Democrats. But for many of their House counterparts, they are akin to betrayal.
Under intense pressure to spare the President a humiliating defeat, enough of them swallowed their doubts last month to give risky backing to the unpopular BTU tax and permit the package a hair's breadth 219-213 victory on the House floor. Now that tax has been withdrawn to appease the Senate. The backlash over what seems a sacrifice for nothing has been furious, especially within the black constituency.
The 37-strong group of black Democrats in the House pulled out of a meeting yesterday with the President. The black congressmen, said their chairman, Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, would not tolerate 'being seen but not heard'. The package could not be passed without their backing.
Once again, the episode is taken as proof of the President's tendency to give in to pressure and his failure to present a forceful case to the country.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments