Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Brussels to get tough over N-tests

Sarah Helm Paris
Monday 09 October 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

In response to a wave of public pressure, the European Commission is expected to take legal steps tomorrow that could halt French nuclear tests in the South Pacific.

Using its powers under the Euratom Treaty, the Commission is expected to send a letter to the French government demanding access to all safety information relating to geological damage and radioactivity. According to a text being discussed in Brussels, the letter will instruct France to hand over the information within five days "and in any case before any further tests in the current series are carried out".

Although two tests have been carried out, the Commission has until now declined to invoke European law, which gives it the power to assess health and safety measures before any "particularly dangerous experiment" is carried out by a member state.

Jacques Santer, the Commission President, has been reluctant to provoke a clash with France, in view of the potential political backlash for the EU. The Commission's nuclear experts advised Mr Santer to send a verification team to inspect safety measures in the South Pacific as long ago as July, but none was sent until after the first test.

French lobbying against intervention by the Commission has been intense. Last week it was revealed in a secret diplomatic memorandum that France was confident it had an understanding with Mr Santer that the Commission would not take action.

However, several factors have brought about a tougher Commission stance. There has been mounting public criticism, reflected in an increasingly belligerent attitude from the European Parliament, which debates the issue tomorrow. The parliament has warned that it might take the Commission to the European Court of Justice for failing in its duty as a "guardian of the treaty".

The Commission initiative has also been provoked by anger at France's failure to hand over sufficient information on safety measures in the South Pacific.

That has intensified in recent days, since Commission officials who visited the region were refused access to the test sites. Nuclear experts working in Brussels have raised serious concerns about potential danger from the tests, warning that cracks in the rock strata could allow leaks of radiation.

The Commission hopes that the letter to Paris will bring about a political compromise. However, if enough safety information is not provided or it does not prove satisfactory, the issue could be taken to the European Court of Justice.

The EU's Euratom Treaty provides the only legal avenue for a challenge to the nuclear testing. Previous tests carried out during the Cold War provoked less concern from the anti-nuclear lobby, and the treaty has rarely been invoked. With the end of the Cold War, however, Greenpeace, supported by many member states, has raised the issue.

The powers of the Commission to challenge France come under Chapter Three of the treaty, which gives Brussels responsibility for protecting the health and safety of workers and the general public against radiation. Article 34 states: "Any member state in whose territories particularly dangerous experiments are to take place shall take additional health and safety measures, on which it shall first obtain the opinion of the Commission."

The Commission has already requested information from the French on health and safety monitoring, but key data has been withheld.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in