Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Julia Gillard survives leadership vote as Kevin Rudd ducks challenge

 

Kathy Marks
Thursday 21 March 2013 15:10 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Some called it a farce, some called it a charade, and others used less printable terms. But at the end of a dramatic and bizarre day in Australian politics, Julia Gillard remained Prime Minister tonight after she called a leadership vote in which no one stood against her.

Tensions within the governing Labor Party had been brewing since Ms Gillard ousted her predecessor, Kevin Rudd, in June 2010, then called an election which led to her cobbling together a minority Labor government. In February last year, Mr Rudd attempted to snatch the leadership back from Australia’s first female Prime Minister, but lost by a sizeable margin in a ballot of Labor MPs and senators.

The Prime Minister wrong-footed opponents by calling a ballot for 4.30pm, giving Mr Rudd’s backers just two hours. As the clock ticked on, there was no sign of Mr Rudd. With less than 10 minutes to go, he appeared.

He declared he would not be contesting the leadership because he had promised after last year’s ballot that he would challenge again only if a majority of his colleagues drafted him in.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in